What's the justification for using a higher discount rate to value risky liabilities? Surely this gives them a low present value, which would suggest we should hold less capital to cover the liability?

Login

0 votes

The idea of using the interest rate to allow for risk in valuation of cashflows needs to be measured up against this problem. For many valuations, for example in Captial Project appraisal, the cashflows later in the project are positive (income) so if they are uncertain then a high i will devalue them appropriately.

In valuation of liabilities, it is more cautious to use a low i rather than a high i.

So the choice of i for prudence needs to be made in the context of the thing that you are doing. There are other ways to allow for risk (using i is a crude way) - for example cashflows can be assigned probabilities or increased to allow for risk.

- All categories
- BUS 1003H - Introduction to Financial Risk (52)
- BUS 2016H - Financial Mathematics (55)
- BUS 3018F - Models (74)
- BUS 3024S - Contingencies (61)
- BUS 4028F - Financial Economics (39)
- BUS 4027W - Actuarial Risk Management (54)
- BUS 4029H - Research Project (5)
- Mphil (1)
- Calculus and Pure Mathematics (4)
- Statistics (16)

...